Modesty
06.06.06 (1:14 am) [edit]
They say the women are being "liberated"? When I was young, men understood that they had to learn to curb their desires. If a man approached a woman as they do today, the woman might slap the man. Most women if a man openly solicited her for sex or intimated that he would stop seeing her unless he got sex, there was little question what a woman should do.- she would know this was a creep not worth putting up with, and tell him to go away. Women understood that when they were sexually provocative, they would attract the wrong kind of man. If women want to "let it all hang out" don't come crying to me that you are being treated like a sex object - you asked for it. What is REALLY wrong is little girls, even pre-teens dressed in a sexually provocative way at the mall. What are their mothers thinking? Especially with all these freaks who want underage children. Little girls dressed sexy does NOT turn me on - it makes me scared and sad.
Is this "free love" really free? How many broken homes and the norm is to have at least one step parent. Children who not only have no daddy, they do not even know who their daddy is. If a man biologically produces a child, this does not make him a man. Even a dog can do that. In fact, even a roach can do that. But it takes a man to RAISE a child. Yes, I was taught to enjoy the great passion of sex and free love, but there isn't much passion in loveless sex. Loveless, promiscuous sex is very, very LONELY. The best sex ever is in a loving, committed marriage and when that love overflows into a new little baby, it can't get any better. A baby is not a possession, but a treasured gift of God whom, if you really love him unselfishly, will bring you closer to God and free you from the solitary confinement of self-love. Who pays for "free" love? The innocent little children. The kids used to charge it to their parents. Now parents charge it to their kids.
Is this "free love" really free? How many broken homes and the norm is to have at least one step parent. Children who not only have no daddy, they do not even know who their daddy is. If a man biologically produces a child, this does not make him a man. Even a dog can do that. In fact, even a roach can do that. But it takes a man to RAISE a child. Yes, I was taught to enjoy the great passion of sex and free love, but there isn't much passion in loveless sex. Loveless, promiscuous sex is very, very LONELY. The best sex ever is in a loving, committed marriage and when that love overflows into a new little baby, it can't get any better. A baby is not a possession, but a treasured gift of God whom, if you really love him unselfishly, will bring you closer to God and free you from the solitary confinement of self-love. Who pays for "free" love? The innocent little children. The kids used to charge it to their parents. Now parents charge it to their kids.